Thursday 21 June 2012

TO: CHARLES SAATCHI (ADVERTISING MOGUL & ART COLLECTOR)

Dear Mr Saatchi & Saatchi:

You have been responsible for many memorable ad campaigns, including pregnant men and pictures of the unemployed queuing for hand-outs which brought Margaret Thatcher to power – when unemployment not unsurprisingly rose even further. At one time, your media empire was so vast that you and brother Maurice tried to buy the Midland Bank, now part of HSBC. You also have a beautiful and well-proportioned wife who is well known for her cookery programmes, and suggestively licking her fingers. In fact, several friends of mine (Steve, Jim and Albert) would give their right arm just for one single night with Nigella, especially if there was chocolate involved. For me, however, the attraction is considerably spoiled by the fact that she is Nigel Lawson's daughter, but I guess (and I hope) you have never had similar problems, because once the thought has invaded your mind, it is hard to forget it...

But what I admire most, apart from your wealth (£120 million) and your beautiful wife, is that you have become Britain's and maybe even the world's greatest artist. During the Renaissance, many of the most accomplished artists (including Michelangelo and Leonardo) employed an army of assistants to do all their dirty work for them. For example, Leonardo may have painted Mona Lisa's so-called enigmatic smile but the landscape in the background was the work of an apprentice. In fact, your protege, Damien Hirst, is another leading example of this kind of practice, who took the idea even further. Sometimes, the great impresario simply thinks up an idea and instructs other people to make it – as if his own imagination has brought the idea to life via psychokinesis. And why not? There is nothing at all wrong in that. Do architects have to lay all of the bricks and install all the plumbing to claim that a building is theirs?

But what interests me most about you is that you have taken this a few steps further than anyone else (including your protege Damien Hirst) and do not even come up with original ideas in the first place! You simply select works and make artists and their “art” famous. In other words, your taste and your decisions are your art. And if you say it is good and you buy it, it immediately rises in value.

You have in fact invented a completely new art form – as if the art exists and is created in your mind by simply deciding it is art. And once you have inflated the prices of art by particular artists, you sell it and trouser the profits. In other words, there is no longer a debate about whether or not art is simply a business like all other trades and transactions. The opposite is now true – the business itself or the buying of art is the art. In fact, the purchase is more interesting “art” than most of the art it concerns (including your protege Damian Hirst).

At least, this is what I think. Can you comfort a hard-living man on his deathbed by confirming this theory is right? I know you are a private man who won't speak to the media or even go to opening nights at your own exhibitions, but it would be nice if you could settle the issue before I am put in a specimen jar like a shark or a cow or a sheep (like one of the great works of art by your protege Damien Hirst).

Has it ever occurred to you that in a parallel universe, you and Maurice may have bought the Midland Bank and appointed Fred Goodwin to run it? If that had happened, maybe you'd have lost all your money (£120 million), and you'd have to sell your artworks and your lovely house in Chelsea, and Nigella would leave you and maybe run off with another celebrity chef.

And finally, one little favour. It occurs to me if you decide that my letter is “art” and deserves to be published, it may persuade a publisher to publish it. Even if it does get published after my death, it would give me great pleasure and not inconsiderable comfort to know that my words will outlive me.

Best wishes,

Ben Nevis (deceased)

No comments:

Post a Comment